HomeClinical ToolsTI-RADS

🦋 Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision

Score thyroid-nodule ultrasound features per ACR TI-RADS (TR1–5) and get an FNA or follow-up recommendation from the level and nodule size. Instant, browser-side.

Clinical takeaway

Punctate echogenic foci (microcalcifications) add 3 points and strongly raise suspicion.

Loading calculator…
Share on XLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

When to use

Standardised malignancy-risk assessment of a thyroid nodule on ultrasound, with FNA/follow-up size thresholds.

How it works

Sum five features — composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, echogenic foci — into TR1 (0), TR2 (1–2), TR3 (3), TR4 (4–6), TR5 (≥ 7). FNA/follow-up thresholds: TR3 ≥ 2.5/1.5 cm, TR4 ≥ 1.5/1.0 cm, TR5 ≥ 1.0/0.5 cm.

Key points

  • Punctate echogenic foci (microcalcifications) add 3 points and strongly raise suspicion.
  • ACR generally does not biopsy nodules < 1 cm even when TR5 (active surveillance is an option for 5–9 mm).
  • With multiple nodules, assess the 1–2 with the highest TR rather than the largest.
  • TR1–2 need no FNA; FNA vs follow-up depends on the size thresholds.

References

Decision support for licensed clinicians only; not a substitute for clinical judgement, diagnosis or local protocols.

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

CompositionCystic / spongiform (0)
EchogenicityAnechoic (0)
Shape (aspect ratio)Wider-than-tall, ratio < 1 (0)
MarginSmooth / ill-defined (0)
Echogenic foci: macrocalcifications (+1)Yes
Echogenic foci: peripheral/rim calcifications (+2)Yes
Echogenic foci: punctate echogenic foci / microcalcifications (+3)Yes
Maximum nodule diameter1.2 cm

DispositionUltrasound follow-up recommended

  • TI-RADS total6 points
  • LevelTR4 (Moderately suspicious (5–20%))
  • Max diameter1.2 cm
CompositionSolid / almost completely solid (2)
EchogenicityVery hypoechoic (3)
Shape (aspect ratio)Taller-than-wide, ratio ≥ 1 (3)
MarginExtra-thyroidal extension (3)
Echogenic foci: macrocalcifications (+1)No
Echogenic foci: peripheral/rim calcifications (+2)No
Echogenic foci: punctate echogenic foci / microcalcifications (+3)No
Maximum nodule diameter1.2 cm

DispositionFNA recommended

  • TI-RADS total11 points
  • LevelTR5 (Highly suspicious (≥ 20%))
  • Max diameter1.2 cm

Frequently asked questions

What is Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision?
Score thyroid-nodule ultrasound features per ACR TI-RADS (TR1–5) and get an FNA or follow-up recommendation from the level and nodule size. Instant, browser-side.
How is Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision calculated? What is the core formula?
Sum five features — composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, echogenic foci — into TR1 (0), TR2 (1–2), TR3 (3), TR4 (4–6), TR5 (≥ 7). FNA/follow-up thresholds: TR3 ≥ 2.5/1.5 cm, TR4 ≥ 1.5/1.0 cm, TR5 ≥ 1.0/0.5 cm.
When is Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision used?
Standardised malignancy-risk assessment of a thyroid nodule on ultrasound, with FNA/follow-up size thresholds.
What are the key clinical points for Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision?
Punctate echogenic foci (microcalcifications) add 3 points and strongly raise suspicion. ACR generally does not biopsy nodules < 1 cm even when TR5 (active surveillance is an option for 5–9 mm). With multiple nodules, assess the 1–2 with the highest TR rather than the largest. TR1–2 need no FNA; FNA vs follow-up depends on the size thresholds.
What are the limits and cautions when using Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision?
For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.
How is Thyroid Nodule ACR TI-RADS & FNA Decision calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
Inputs: Composition Cystic / spongiform (0), Echogenicity Anechoic (0), Shape (aspect ratio) Wider-than-tall, ratio < 1 (0), Margin Smooth / ill-defined (0), Echogenic foci: macrocalcifications (+1) Yes, Echogenic foci: peripheral/rim calcifications (+2) Yes, Echogenic foci: punctate echogenic foci / microcalcifications (+3) Yes, Maximum nodule diameter 1.2 cm → Result: Disposition Ultrasound follow-up recommended(TI-RADS total: 6 points, Level: TR4 (Moderately suspicious (5–20%)), Max diameter: 1.2 cm) Inputs: Composition Solid / almost completely solid (2), Echogenicity Very hypoechoic (3), Shape (aspect ratio) Taller-than-wide, ratio ≥ 1 (3), Margin Extra-thyroidal extension (3), Echogenic foci: macrocalcifications (+1) No, Echogenic foci: peripheral/rim calcifications (+2) No, Echogenic foci: punctate echogenic foci / microcalcifications (+3) No, Maximum nodule diameter 1.2 cm → Result: Disposition FNA recommended(TI-RADS total: 11 points, Level: TR5 (Highly suspicious (≥ 20%)), Max diameter: 1.2 cm)

Other tools

🔍 Pulmonary nodule🎀 BI-RADS🫀 LI-RADS🔬 PI-RADS

中文版 →