Ectopic Pregnancy · Expectant vs MTX vs Surgery
Rupture/unstable → emergency surgery; low and falling hCG → expectant; stable <5000/mass ≤3.5-4 cm/no cardiac activity → MTX; surgery is salpingostomy vs salpingectomy.
Rupture/unstable → emergency surgery: Rupture/hemodynamically unstable/acute abdomen/hemoperitoneum → emergency surgery (laparoscopic or open) + resuscitation and transfusion; u…
Step-by-step decision
Choose step by step as prompted; reaching an endpoint gives the management recommendation. You can go back a step or restart anytime.
🎓 Want to practice? Do a case challenge with this pathway → (get a case, choose management step by step, scored).
Full pathway
- [Decision] Rupture/stable + hCG/mass/cardiac activity + follow-upHemodynamics? hCG/mass/cardiac activity? Able to follow up?
- Rupture/hemodynamically unstable/acute abdomen/hemoperitoneum → Rupture/unstable → emergency surgery
- Stable, low and falling hCG, asymptomatic (PUL/resolving) → Low and falling hCG → expectant
- Stable, unruptured, hCG <5000, mass ≤3.5–4 cm, no cardiac activity, no MTX contraindication, can follow up → Meets criteria → methotrexate
- Stable but high hCG/large mass/cardiac activity/MTX contraindicated or failed/patient chooses surgery → Surgery · salpingostomy vs salpingectomy
- [End] Rupture/unstable → emergency surgeryRupture/hemodynamically unstable/acute abdomen/hemoperitoneum → emergency surgery (laparoscopic or open) + resuscitation and transfusion; usually ipsilateral salpingectomy.
- [End] Low and falling hCG → expectantStable, low hCG (e.g. <200) and steadily falling, asymptomatic → expectant management, close follow-up of hCG to negative; rising hCG/symptoms → switch to MTX or surgery.
- [End] Meets criteria → methotrexateMeets criteria → single-dose MTX 50 mg/m² IM; check hCG on days 4 and 7 (expect ≥15% fall from day 4 to 7), inadequate → second dose or surgery; high hCG may use a multidose regimen; contraception during treatment, avoid folate/NSAID interactions, follow to negative.
- [Decision] Surgery · salpingostomy vs salpingectomyPreserve the tube or remove it?
- Contralateral tube normal/fertility preservation needed, bleeding controllable → salpingostomy → Salpingostomy
- Ipsilateral severely damaged/uncontrolled bleeding/recurrence in same tube/no fertility wish → salpingectomy → Salpingectomy
- [End] SalpingostomySalpingostomy — preserves the tube; risk of persistent trophoblast, follow hCG to negative postoperatively.
- [End] SalpingectomySalpingectomy — ipsilateral destroyed/uncontrolled bleeding/recurrence in the same tube/no fertility wish; with a normal contralateral tube, future fertility is similar to salpingostomy.
Source guidelines & references
- Tubal ectopic pregnancy management (ACOG Practice Bulletin 193; MTX criterion hCG <5000)
This pathway is our own synthesis of the decision logic in the guidelines above (not the guideline verbatim); thresholds and workflows change as guidelines update — in practice follow the latest guideline, your institution's protocol and the individual patient.
Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.