Guideline decision tool · Radiology
🫁

Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision — free guideline decision tool

This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.

Open guideline tool →
Computed locally — no data uploaded. For licensed clinicians.
📋

Guideline-based

Implements the decision logic from published clinical guidelines.

🖥️

Runs in your browser

No installation. Enter the patient's values and get a guideline recommendation instantly.

🔒

Data stays local

Nothing is uploaded. Results are for licensed clinicians only.

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

Detection scenarioCheckup/incidental (Fleischner)
Nodule typeSolid
Total nodule diameter (mean)9 mm
Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid)5 mm
Lung-cancer riskLow risk
Compared with prior CTBaseline/first detection
NumberSingle
Location (affects procedure)Peripheral (outer 1/3)

ConclusionFleischner solid > 8 mm · surgical-assessment window

  • ClassificationFleischner solid > 8 mm (malignancy probability ~3%+, assess by probability)
  • (1) Follow-up strategyEnter active assessment: choose one of CT at 3 months / PET-CT / tissue sampling.
  • (2) Diagnostic approachPET-CT (high value for solid ≥ 8 mm; often false-negative and of limited value for pure/subsolid ground-glass); non-surgical biopsy — peripheral nodules CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB), central/needing mediastinal staging use bronchoscopy + EBUS-TBNA; indeterminate nodules (highly suspected early cancer but biopsy inconclusive) → MDT + shared decision-making.
Detection scenarioLDCT lung-cancer screening (Lung-RADS)
Nodule typePure ground-glass pGGN
Total nodule diameter (mean)9 mm
Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid)5 mm
Lung-cancer riskHigh risk (≥ 40 yr and smoking ≥ 20 pack-years/family history/COPD/occupational exposure, etc.)
Compared with prior CTNew or enlarging
NumberMultiple
Location (affects procedure)Central

ConclusionLung-RADS 2 · follow-up primary

  • ClassificationLung-RADS 2 (malignancy probability < 1%)
  • (1) Follow-up strategy12-month low-dose CT, continue annual screening. New/enlarging (mean ≥ 1.5 mm/year) is graded more aggressively with shorter intervals; with suspicious features such as spiculation/lymph nodes → 4X.
  • (2) Diagnostic approachImaging follow-up primary, no PET/biopsy needed; a single tumor marker is not recommended for tiny-nodule screening.

Common questions

What is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?

This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.

How is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision calculated? What is the core formula?

Screening → Lung-RADS category by type/size/solid component. Incidental → Fleischner by type and size. Surgical window triggered by Lung-RADS 4B, solid > 8 mm, part-solid solid component ≥ 6 mm, or persistent enlarging GGN ≥ 10 mm.

When is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision used?

Use to classify by Lung-RADS (screening) or Fleischner (incidental), refine follow-up with the Chinese 2024 consensus, and gauge the surgical window and procedure.

What are the key clinical points for Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?

Sublobar resection requires preoperatively negative mediastinal staging, and intraoperative N1/N2 mandates conversion to lobectomy. (original synthesis · not guideline verbatim) Pure GGN is prone to PET false-negatives and a long doubling time does not exclude indolent adenocarcinoma. Solid-component size and growth are the core invasiveness markers driving escalation.

What are the limits and cautions when using Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?

For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.

How is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?

Inputs: Detection scenario Checkup/incidental (Fleischner), Nodule type Solid, Total nodule diameter (mean) 9 mm, Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) 5 mm, Lung-cancer risk Low risk, Compared with prior CT Baseline/first detection, Number Single, Location (affects procedure) Peripheral (outer 1/3) → Result: Conclusion Fleischner solid > 8 mm · surgical-assessment window(Classification: Fleischner solid > 8 mm (malignancy probability ~3%+, assess by probability), (1) Follow-up strategy: Enter active assessment: choose one of CT at 3 months / PET-CT / tissue sampling., (2) Diagnostic approach: PET-CT (high value for solid ≥ 8 mm; often false-negative and of limited value for pure/subsolid ground-glass); non-surgical biopsy — peripheral nodules CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB), central/needing mediastinal staging use bronchoscopy + EBUS-TBNA; indeterminate nodules (highly suspected early cancer but biopsy inconclusive) → MDT + shared decision-making.) Inputs: Detection scenario LDCT lung-cancer screening (Lung-RADS), Nodule type Pure ground-glass pGGN, Total nodule diameter (mean) 9 mm, Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) 5 mm, Lung-cancer risk High risk (≥ 40 yr and smoking ≥ 20 pack-years/family history/COPD/occupational exposure, etc.), Compared with prior CT New or enlarging, Number Multiple, Location (affects procedure) Central → Result: Conclusion Lung-RADS 2 · follow-up primary(Classification: Lung-RADS 2 (malignancy probability < 1%), (1) Follow-up strategy: 12-month low-dose CT, continue annual screening. New/enlarging (mean ≥ 1.5 mm/year) is graded more aggressively with shorter intervals; with suspicious features such as spiculation/lymph nodes → 4X., (2) Diagnostic approach: Imaging follow-up primary, no PET/biopsy needed; a single tumor marker is not recommended for tiny-nodule screening.)

🫁

Run Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision now

This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.

Open guideline tool →

For licensed clinicians. Not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Share on XLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

Related guideline tools

For use by licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Computed locally in your browser — no data is uploaded. Not a substitute for clinical judgement.