Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision — free guideline decision tool
This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.
Open guideline tool →Guideline-based
Implements the decision logic from published clinical guidelines.
Runs in your browser
No installation. Enter the patient's values and get a guideline recommendation instantly.
Data stays local
Nothing is uploaded. Results are for licensed clinicians only.
Worked calculation
The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.
| Detection scenario | Checkup/incidental (Fleischner) |
|---|---|
| Nodule type | Solid |
| Total nodule diameter (mean) | 9 mm |
| Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) | 5 mm |
| Lung-cancer risk | Low risk |
| Compared with prior CT | Baseline/first detection |
| Number | Single |
| Location (affects procedure) | Peripheral (outer 1/3) |
→ConclusionFleischner solid > 8 mm · surgical-assessment window
- Classification:Fleischner solid > 8 mm (malignancy probability ~3%+, assess by probability)
- (1) Follow-up strategy:Enter active assessment: choose one of CT at 3 months / PET-CT / tissue sampling.
- (2) Diagnostic approach:PET-CT (high value for solid ≥ 8 mm; often false-negative and of limited value for pure/subsolid ground-glass); non-surgical biopsy — peripheral nodules CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB), central/needing mediastinal staging use bronchoscopy + EBUS-TBNA; indeterminate nodules (highly suspected early cancer but biopsy inconclusive) → MDT + shared decision-making.
| Detection scenario | LDCT lung-cancer screening (Lung-RADS) |
|---|---|
| Nodule type | Pure ground-glass pGGN |
| Total nodule diameter (mean) | 9 mm |
| Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) | 5 mm |
| Lung-cancer risk | High risk (≥ 40 yr and smoking ≥ 20 pack-years/family history/COPD/occupational exposure, etc.) |
| Compared with prior CT | New or enlarging |
| Number | Multiple |
| Location (affects procedure) | Central |
→ConclusionLung-RADS 2 · follow-up primary
- Classification:Lung-RADS 2 (malignancy probability < 1%)
- (1) Follow-up strategy:12-month low-dose CT, continue annual screening. New/enlarging (mean ≥ 1.5 mm/year) is graded more aggressively with shorter intervals; with suspicious features such as spiculation/lymph nodes → 4X.
- (2) Diagnostic approach:Imaging follow-up primary, no PET/biopsy needed; a single tumor marker is not recommended for tiny-nodule screening.
Common questions
What is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?
This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.
How is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision calculated? What is the core formula?
Screening → Lung-RADS category by type/size/solid component. Incidental → Fleischner by type and size. Surgical window triggered by Lung-RADS 4B, solid > 8 mm, part-solid solid component ≥ 6 mm, or persistent enlarging GGN ≥ 10 mm.
When is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision used?
Use to classify by Lung-RADS (screening) or Fleischner (incidental), refine follow-up with the Chinese 2024 consensus, and gauge the surgical window and procedure.
What are the key clinical points for Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?
Sublobar resection requires preoperatively negative mediastinal staging, and intraoperative N1/N2 mandates conversion to lobectomy. (original synthesis · not guideline verbatim) Pure GGN is prone to PET false-negatives and a long doubling time does not exclude indolent adenocarcinoma. Solid-component size and growth are the core invasiveness markers driving escalation.
What are the limits and cautions when using Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision?
For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.
How is Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?
Inputs: Detection scenario Checkup/incidental (Fleischner), Nodule type Solid, Total nodule diameter (mean) 9 mm, Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) 5 mm, Lung-cancer risk Low risk, Compared with prior CT Baseline/first detection, Number Single, Location (affects procedure) Peripheral (outer 1/3) → Result: Conclusion Fleischner solid > 8 mm · surgical-assessment window(Classification: Fleischner solid > 8 mm (malignancy probability ~3%+, assess by probability), (1) Follow-up strategy: Enter active assessment: choose one of CT at 3 months / PET-CT / tissue sampling., (2) Diagnostic approach: PET-CT (high value for solid ≥ 8 mm; often false-negative and of limited value for pure/subsolid ground-glass); non-surgical biopsy — peripheral nodules CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB), central/needing mediastinal staging use bronchoscopy + EBUS-TBNA; indeterminate nodules (highly suspected early cancer but biopsy inconclusive) → MDT + shared decision-making.) Inputs: Detection scenario LDCT lung-cancer screening (Lung-RADS), Nodule type Pure ground-glass pGGN, Total nodule diameter (mean) 9 mm, Solid-component diameter (required for part-solid) 5 mm, Lung-cancer risk High risk (≥ 40 yr and smoking ≥ 20 pack-years/family history/COPD/occupational exposure, etc.), Compared with prior CT New or enlarging, Number Multiple, Location (affects procedure) Central → Result: Conclusion Lung-RADS 2 · follow-up primary(Classification: Lung-RADS 2 (malignancy probability < 1%), (1) Follow-up strategy: 12-month low-dose CT, continue annual screening. New/enlarging (mean ≥ 1.5 mm/year) is graded more aggressively with shorter intervals; with suspicious features such as spiculation/lymph nodes → 4X., (2) Diagnostic approach: Imaging follow-up primary, no PET/biopsy needed; a single tumor marker is not recommended for tiny-nodule screening.)
Run Pulmonary Nodule Smart Manager · Follow-up & Surgical Decision now
This tool turns nodule type, size, scenario, risk, and dynamics into classification, malignancy stratification, follow-up, diagnostic approach, surgical window, and procedure recommendation in one pass.
Open guideline tool →For licensed clinicians. Not a substitute for clinical judgement.
Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.