Guideline decision tool · Radiology
🎀

Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read — free guideline decision tool

Enter mammography findings and get a suggested BI-RADS v2025 (6th edition) category by 'most suspicious feature decides the category'. Instant, browser-side.

Open guideline tool →
Computed locally — no data uploaded. For licensed clinicians.
📋

Guideline-based

Implements the decision logic from published clinical guidelines.

🖥️

Runs in your browser

No installation. Enter the patient's values and get a guideline recommendation instantly.

🔒

Data stays local

Nothing is uploaded. Results are for licensed clinicians only.

Worked calculation

The values below come from this tool's own example placeholders and are computed server-side with the formula shown on this page, so the arithmetic can be checked quickly. It demonstrates how to substitute values only — it is not clinical advice and not a real case.

Mass marginNo mass
Mass shape/densityNot applicable (no mass)
Calcification morphologyNo calcifications
Calcification distributionNot applicable (no calcifications)
AsymmetryNone
Architectural distortionNone
Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy)None

Suggested categoryBI-RADS 1

  • Suggested categoryBI-RADS 1: Negative
  • Deciding featureNo abnormal feature entered (negative)
  • ManagementNo abnormal finding: routine screening
Mass marginSpiculated
Mass shape/densityFat-containing (lipoma/hamartoma/oil cyst)
Calcification morphologyFine linear / fine-linear branching
Calcification distributionSegmental
AsymmetryDeveloping asymmetry
Architectural distortionPresent
Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy)Present

Suggested categoryBI-RADS 5

  • Suggested categoryBI-RADS 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy (≥ 95%)
  • Deciding featuremost suspicious feature → suspicious feature + skin/nipple retraction or similar associated feature (also: spiculated mass, fine linear / branching calcifications, fine-linear branching + segmental/linear distribution, developing asymmetry, architectural distortion, with skin/nipple retraction etc. → upgraded to 5)
  • ManagementBiopsy/management; a benign pathology discordant with imaging still needs surgical consultation

Common questions

What is Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read?

Enter mammography findings and get a suggested BI-RADS v2025 (6th edition) category by 'most suspicious feature decides the category'. Instant, browser-side.

How is Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read calculated? What is the core formula?

Most suspicious feature drives the level: spiculated mass or fine-linear branching calcifications (segmental/linear) or suspicious feature + retraction → 4C–5; suspicious calcifications, microlobulated/indistinct margin, irregular/high-density mass, developing asymmetry, distortion → 4; circumscribed mass / focal asymmetry → 3; benign calcifications / fat-containing mass → 2.

When is Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read used?

Structured assistance in assigning a mammography BI-RADS category from descriptors.

What are the key clinical points for Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read?

BI-RADS has no official scoring — the category is set by the most suspicious feature. Associated features (skin/nipple retraction) can upgrade a suspicious finding to 5. v2025 splits category 0 into 'needs additional imaging' and 'needs prior comparison'. The final category must integrate bilateral comparison, prior films and clinical context.

What are the limits and cautions when using Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read?

For licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Interpret results with history, investigations and local protocols; not a diagnosis or prescription, and not a substitute for multidisciplinary decision-making or local guidelines.

How is Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read calculated in practice? Can you show a worked example?

Inputs: Mass margin No mass, Mass shape/density Not applicable (no mass), Calcification morphology No calcifications, Calcification distribution Not applicable (no calcifications), Asymmetry None, Architectural distortion None, Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy) None → Result: Suggested category BI-RADS 1(Suggested category: BI-RADS 1: Negative, Deciding feature: No abnormal feature entered (negative), Management: No abnormal finding: routine screening) Inputs: Mass margin Spiculated, Mass shape/density Fat-containing (lipoma/hamartoma/oil cyst), Calcification morphology Fine linear / fine-linear branching, Calcification distribution Segmental, Asymmetry Developing asymmetry, Architectural distortion Present, Suspicious associated features (skin/nipple retraction, skin thickening, axillary adenopathy) Present → Result: Suggested category BI-RADS 5(Suggested category: BI-RADS 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy (≥ 95%), Deciding feature: most suspicious feature → suspicious feature + skin/nipple retraction or similar associated feature (also: spiculated mass, fine linear / branching calcifications, fine-linear branching + segmental/linear distribution, developing asymmetry, architectural distortion, with skin/nipple retraction etc. → upgraded to 5), Management: Biopsy/management; a benign pathology discordant with imaging still needs surgical consultation)

🎀

Run Mammography BI-RADS Structured Read now

Enter mammography findings and get a suggested BI-RADS v2025 (6th edition) category by 'most suspicious feature decides the category'. Instant, browser-side.

Open guideline tool →

For licensed clinicians. Not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Share on XLinkedInWhatsAppEmail

Paste the link in Slack, Teams, X, or LinkedIn — the preview image comes from this page’s Open Graph card.

Related guideline tools

For use by licensed clinicians and clinical researchers. Computed locally in your browser — no data is uploaded. Not a substitute for clinical judgement.